Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Webpush encryption draft changes #48

Closed
PascalReintjens opened this issue Nov 1, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Webpush encryption draft changes #48

PascalReintjens opened this issue Nov 1, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@PascalReintjens
Copy link

@PascalReintjens PascalReintjens commented Nov 1, 2016

Hello @Minishlink,

I don't know if you have seen the new draft from yesterday, but to me it seems like it modified some things which could require changes in the web-push-php lib: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-05

Thanks for your work :)

@Minishlink
Copy link
Member

@Minishlink Minishlink commented Apr 19, 2017

Newest draft is https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-08

@jrconlin @gauntface Are there any deadlines for Firefox or Chrome?

@Minishlink Minishlink changed the title Webpush encryption draft 5 changes Webpush encryption draft changes Apr 19, 2017
@jrconlin
Copy link
Member

@jrconlin jrconlin commented Apr 19, 2017

It's best to consider that your target may be running older versions. There are still quite a few installs of older firefox out there even though we do our best to make sure folks upgrade.

Mozilla is a bit "resource constrained" at the moment, and we've not yet implemented "aes128gcm" draft for desktop.

@Minishlink
Copy link
Member

@Minishlink Minishlink commented Apr 19, 2017

Ok, thanks! I guess the endpoint versions will change when the "aes128gcm" content coding is implemented?

@jrconlin
Copy link
Member

@jrconlin jrconlin commented Apr 19, 2017

Probably not, since the push service doesn't do the decryption. It passes the information through opaquely. More than likely, there would be some bit of information passed along via the User Agent registration call.

I've proposed a modification to the working group to get buy in. (It's a good idea so that various vendors standardize on something.)

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/uDR2PzpChfn24TwNWZBfR6fuKp0

thanks!

@Minishlink
Copy link
Member

@Minishlink Minishlink commented Apr 20, 2017

I see, thanks for the info :)

@Minishlink
Copy link
Member

@Minishlink Minishlink commented Mar 17, 2018

Available in v4.0.0 :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants