Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SECDIR review #16

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Aug 2, 2017
Merged

SECDIR review #16

merged 6 commits into from Aug 2, 2017

Conversation

martinthomson
Copy link
Contributor

@martinthomson martinthomson commented Jul 25, 2017

No description provided.

authenticated and provides confidentiality and integrity, such as HTTPS
{{?RFC2818}}, is sufficient.
an Application Server that can be used to initiate and secure communications for
key distribution. Any existing communication mechanism that is authenticated
Copy link
Contributor

@beverloo beverloo Jul 26, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about simplifying to "that can be used for key distribution", as the following sentence describes the security aspects of the communication channel?

It might be worthwhile to explicitly mention the endpoint too -- especially if subscription restrictions are not being used, the security aspects of the channel used to communicate the endpoint (which otherwise relies on endpoint secrecy) should be identical.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@martinthomson martinthomson Jul 27, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I'll make this "subscription data" instead. Keys are critical, but the rest of the subscription information is similarly important.

@martinthomson martinthomson merged commit d495a65 into master Aug 2, 2017
1 check passed
@martinthomson martinthomson deleted the secdir branch Aug 2, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants