Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pure browser based popcorn time alternative #464

Closed
kof opened this issue Oct 16, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

pure browser based popcorn time alternative #464

kof opened this issue Oct 16, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@kof
Copy link

@kof kof commented Oct 16, 2015

Do you think its hard to do? What are the issues we would have to solve?

@gauravsaini

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@gauravsaini gauravsaini commented Oct 16, 2015

I think people are already trying it before as well . There is a popcorn time build based on webtorrent.js
But it is not allowed to discuss this over here.

@kof

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@kof kof commented Oct 16, 2015

any links?

@ericwooley

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@ericwooley ericwooley commented Oct 16, 2015

The real issue you are getting at is sharing data between the non-webrtc torrent network and the webrtc (webtorrent) clients. You need some kind of bridge, which is what webtorrent hybrid is about.

@kof

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@kof kof commented Oct 16, 2015

Right, they are using different data protocols ...

@kof

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@kof kof commented Oct 16, 2015

We should actually make popcorn...e use webtorrent in parallel to allow both. Maybe someone has connections to those guys? They have closed a forum, not every one can write there.

@ericwooley

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@ericwooley ericwooley commented Oct 16, 2015

I would probably stop talking about popcorn time specifically here, I doubt webtorrent wants to be associated with pirating.

The other thing to think about is how webtorrent users will rarely be good seeders, they will leach for a while and bail. You would need to convince services that there is a benefit to a browser version, because it will drain their other users.

It might be a good idea for some kind of browser extension that provides a global version of webtorrent, which individual pages should check for before creating their own client, so that the instance can span pages and be a better citizen for seeding. If this were to pick up, pages that use webtorrent can advertise the extensions which would offer better persistance etc...

@kof

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@kof kof commented Oct 16, 2015

webtorrent users will rarely be good seeders

why?

@feross

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@feross feross commented Oct 16, 2015

Don't use WebTorrent for copyright infringement. The WebTorrent project and contributors don't support piracy and cannot help with your questions. See our rules for information.

This discussion is closed and locked.

@feross feross closed this Oct 16, 2015
@webtorrent webtorrent locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.