Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

first commit, yo #17

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

first commit, yo #17

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@nhuber
Copy link

nhuber commented Nov 17, 2013

I had to withdraw from 106X because I got really behind (mainly due to the personal stuff we've discussed) so would love to have a programming side project for the rest of the quarter. The Experiment Club was an interesting idea, but there's lots of existing ways on campus to get involved and meet people. However, I think working on this with you would be a unique opportunity to do something real, cutting-edge and cool with someone I respect a ton. Let's talk some time to discuss next steps? -Nick

@nhuber

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

nhuber commented Nov 17, 2013

cc @feross

@nhuber

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

nhuber commented Nov 17, 2013

Maybe an ordered reading list of the existing project?

Watched your conference talk for high-level motivation and am meaning to grind through all of these so assuming they're well commented I can probably grok everything somewhat independently, but some sense for "where I'm headed" might be helpful...Also, first mini-projects to get a quick win under my belt would be nice :)

@feross

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

feross commented Nov 18, 2013

Hey man, thanks for the interest in contributing. At this stage in the project there's a lot to do but it's not very structured. It's still really experimental and I don't know what would be good for you to work on. There's not really any mini-projects, just big difficult things.

For example, I spent all day yesterday writing this module native-buffer-browserify which improves the browserify project in a way that is likely to be useful to webtorrent. Makes the Buffer object a lot faster.

It might turn out to be the wrong approach and we might even need to ditch browserify completely. I've put in a lot of time to get browserify to work for our use case (see chrome-app-socket) which is cool because now everyone benefits. But it would also be cool to just get a crude demo of webtorrent up...

Anyway, if you see some piece that you think you can do, go for it. Sorry there's not more direction.

@nhuber

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

nhuber commented Nov 18, 2013

Damn, ok thanks for thinking about it and replying in so much detail.

I will take a look around and see how much makes sense to me. Also, please keep me in mind as you're working on this though :) I'm really going crazy because I'm super under-committed right now and the idleness is a virus on my existence. Maybe I'll do a little python data hack or something. Would be great to be able to keep you posted so that I can have some social commitment device. Would you be up for that? The only commitment I'm looking for is like reading my email/talking on the phone occasionally.

Gogogogo! I want this to exist. Unlike peercdn, I actually understand why it's cool, which I think is a reasonably valuable signal.

(FYI, think I'm going to miss this week's node meeting because I want to go to Cheever's talk.) Unless it's going to be particularly amazing?

@feross

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

feross commented Nov 19, 2013

Yeah dude. Of course. Definitely keep me posted on whatever you hack on via email/phone.

@feross feross closed this Nov 19, 2013
bricewge pushed a commit to bricewge/webtorrent that referenced this pull request May 11, 2018
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 17, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.