Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Base web seed pipeline length on piece length #723

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 6, 2016
Merged

Base web seed pipeline length on piece length #723

merged 1 commit into from Apr 6, 2016

Conversation

@feross
Copy link
Member

feross commented Apr 6, 2016

Before this, the web seed pipeline length was based on the block size,
just like it is for wire connections, which are block-based.

This meant that we were massively over-estimating the number of http
requests to make to the web seed servers.

Now we use the piece length, since each web seed request is a piece
length in size.

Before this, the web seed pipeline length was based on the block size,
just like it is for wire connections, which are block-based.

This meant that we were massively over-estimating the number of http
requests to make to the web seed servers.

Now we use the piece length, since each web seed request is a piece
length in size.
@feross

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

feross commented Apr 6, 2016

Reviewed in-person by @dcposch. 👍

@feross feross merged commit fa9016c into master Apr 6, 2016
2 of 4 checks passed
2 of 4 checks passed
continuous-integration/appveyor/branch Waiting for AppVeyor build to complete
Details
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr Waiting for AppVeyor build to complete
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed
Details
@feross feross deleted the web-seed branch Apr 6, 2016
@feross feross mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2016
@feross

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

feross commented Apr 6, 2016

0.90.2

@dcposch

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

dcposch commented Apr 6, 2016

👍

@lock

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

lock bot commented May 4, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked because it has not had recent activity. To discuss futher, please open a new issue.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.