New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deploy as Oxygen Add-on? #1

Closed
MenteaXML opened this Issue Nov 7, 2012 · 5 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@MenteaXML

MenteaXML commented Nov 7, 2012

Consider zipping everything up and making it available as a hosted add-on for Oxygen.

See http://www.oxygenxml.com/doc/ug-editor/topics/dg-deploying-addons.html

@wendellpiez wendellpiez closed this Nov 7, 2012

@wendellpiez wendellpiez reopened this Nov 7, 2012

@wendellpiez

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@wendellpiez

wendellpiez Nov 7, 2012

Owner

(Oops, didn't mean to close.) We'll certainly do this, if not a better alternative, once things have "matured" a bit.

Owner

wendellpiez commented Nov 7, 2012

(Oops, didn't mean to close.) We'll certainly do this, if not a better alternative, once things have "matured" a bit.

@MenteaXML

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@MenteaXML

MenteaXML Oct 25, 2013

I had thought about using the Zip of the 'master' branch as the add-on distribution as you did, but I think you're going to have to increment the version number in the descriptor before Oxygen will notice any differences in the add-on, plus you'll make it harder for users to report problems if no-one can tell exactly where the files were up to when they downloaded the archive.

As a convenience for you for testing or as a stop-gap until you do your BITs bits, it does make sense, however.

MenteaXML commented Oct 25, 2013

I had thought about using the Zip of the 'master' branch as the add-on distribution as you did, but I think you're going to have to increment the version number in the descriptor before Oxygen will notice any differences in the add-on, plus you'll make it harder for users to report problems if no-one can tell exactly where the files were up to when they downloaded the archive.

As a convenience for you for testing or as a stop-gap until you do your BITs bits, it does make sense, however.

@wendellpiez

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@wendellpiez

wendellpiez Oct 26, 2013

Owner

Tony,

You're giving me too much credit for being deliberate and knowing what I am
doing.

In any case, I'm going to have to update documentation regarding "how to do
it" at least regarding installation. When I do I'll ask you please to
review.

Cheers, Wendell

Wendell Piez | http://www.wendellpiez.com
XML | XSLT | electronic publishing
Eat Your Vegetables
____oo_________o_o___ooooo____ooooooo^

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Mentea notifications@github.com wrote:

I had thought about using the Zip of the 'master' branch as the add-on
distribution as you did, but I think you're going to have to increment the
version number in the descriptor before Oxygen will notice any differences
in the add-on, plus you'll make it harder for users to report problems if
no-one can tell exactly where the files were up to when they downloaded the
archive.

As a convenience for you for testing or as a stop-gap until you do your
BITs bits, it does make sense, however.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/wendellpiez/JATSKit/issues/1#issuecomment-27133755
.

Owner

wendellpiez commented Oct 26, 2013

Tony,

You're giving me too much credit for being deliberate and knowing what I am
doing.

In any case, I'm going to have to update documentation regarding "how to do
it" at least regarding installation. When I do I'll ask you please to
review.

Cheers, Wendell

Wendell Piez | http://www.wendellpiez.com
XML | XSLT | electronic publishing
Eat Your Vegetables
____oo_________o_o___ooooo____ooooooo^

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Mentea notifications@github.com wrote:

I had thought about using the Zip of the 'master' branch as the add-on
distribution as you did, but I think you're going to have to increment the
version number in the descriptor before Oxygen will notice any differences
in the add-on, plus you'll make it harder for users to report problems if
no-one can tell exactly where the files were up to when they downloaded the
archive.

As a convenience for you for testing or as a stop-gap until you do your
BITs bits, it does make sense, however.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/wendellpiez/JATSKit/issues/1#issuecomment-27133755
.

@raducoravu

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@raducoravu

raducoravu Oct 3, 2014

Collaborator

I just updated the add-on descritor XML to release version 1.0.0 of the add-on, I also left a 0.9.0 version in it pointing to an older ZIP archive from GIT. Users will by default see the 1.0.0 version as an installable add-on but there is also a checkbox called "Show only the latest version of the add-on" which they can uncheck to also see older versions.

Collaborator

raducoravu commented Oct 3, 2014

I just updated the add-on descritor XML to release version 1.0.0 of the add-on, I also left a 0.9.0 version in it pointing to an older ZIP archive from GIT. Users will by default see the 1.0.0 version as an installable add-on but there is also a checkbox called "Show only the latest version of the add-on" which they can uncheck to also see older versions.

@raducoravu raducoravu closed this Oct 3, 2014

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment