From 20d88f9da4354cd39bc6f5116cbbbafe2f78bbdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Hickson Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:21:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [e] (0) Let's try adding even more text explaining article vs section. Affected topics: HTML git-svn-id: http://svn.whatwg.org/webapps@7666 340c8d12-0b0e-0410-8428-c7bf67bfef74 --- complete.html | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- index | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- source | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/complete.html b/complete.html index c5b71142878..6798d1e32c0 100644 --- a/complete.html +++ b/complete.html @@ -484,7 +484,9 @@

Living Standard — Last Updated 29 January 20134.4.11 Headings and sections
  1. 4.4.11.1 Creating an outline
-
  • 4.4.12 Usage summary
  • +
  • 4.4.12 Usage summary +
      +
    1. 4.4.12.1 Article or section?
  • 4.5 Grouping content
    1. 4.5.1 The p element
    2. @@ -18639,7 +18641,27 @@

      4.4.12 Usage summary

      </footer> </article> -

      4.5 Grouping content

      +
      4.4.12.1 Article or section?
      + +

      This section is non-normative.

      + +

      A section forms part of something else. An article is its own thing. + But how does one know which is which? Mostly the real answer is "it depends on author intent".

      + +

      For example, one could imagine a book with a "Granny Smith" chapter that just said "These + juicy, green apples make a great filling for apple pies."; that would be a section + because there'd be lots of other chapters on (maybe) other kinds of apples.

      + +

      On the other hand, one could imagine a tweet or reddit comment or tumblr post or newspaper + classified ad that just said "Granny Smith. These juicy, green apples make a great filling for + apple pies."; it would then be articles because that was the whole thing.

      + +

      A comment on an article is not part of the article on which it is commenting, + therefore it is its own article.

      + + + +

      4.5 Grouping content

      4.5.1 The p element

      diff --git a/index b/index index c5b71142878..6798d1e32c0 100644 --- a/index +++ b/index @@ -484,7 +484,9 @@
    3. 4.4.11 Headings and sections
      1. 4.4.11.1 Creating an outline
    4. -
    5. 4.4.12 Usage summary
  • +
  • 4.4.12 Usage summary +
      +
    1. 4.4.12.1 Article or section?
  • 4.5 Grouping content
    1. 4.5.1 The p element
    2. @@ -18639,7 +18641,27 @@ Space is not the only void </footer> </article> -

      4.5 Grouping content

      +
      4.4.12.1 Article or section?
      + +

      This section is non-normative.

      + +

      A section forms part of something else. An article is its own thing. + But how does one know which is which? Mostly the real answer is "it depends on author intent".

      + +

      For example, one could imagine a book with a "Granny Smith" chapter that just said "These + juicy, green apples make a great filling for apple pies."; that would be a section + because there'd be lots of other chapters on (maybe) other kinds of apples.

      + +

      On the other hand, one could imagine a tweet or reddit comment or tumblr post or newspaper + classified ad that just said "Granny Smith. These juicy, green apples make a great filling for + apple pies."; it would then be articles because that was the whole thing.

      + +

      A comment on an article is not part of the article on which it is commenting, + therefore it is its own article.

      + + + +

      4.5 Grouping content

      4.5.1 The p element

      diff --git a/source b/source index 59b852c0fce..94eb0d8fba7 100644 --- a/source +++ b/source @@ -19703,6 +19703,26 @@ Space is not the only void +
      Article or section?
      + +

      This section is non-normative.

      + +

      A section forms part of something else. An article is its own thing. + But how does one know which is which? Mostly the real answer is "it depends on author intent".

      + +

      For example, one could imagine a book with a "Granny Smith" chapter that just said "These + juicy, green apples make a great filling for apple pies."; that would be a section + because there'd be lots of other chapters on (maybe) other kinds of apples.

      + +

      On the other hand, one could imagine a tweet or reddit comment or tumblr post or newspaper + classified ad that just said "Granny Smith. These juicy, green apples make a great filling for + apple pies."; it would then be articles because that was the whole thing.

      + +

      A comment on an article is not part of the article on which it is commenting, + therefore it is its own article.

      + + +

      Grouping content

      The p element