Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ELY-189] OTP SASL client and server implementation and tests #222

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Jul 16, 2015

Conversation

fjuma
Copy link
Contributor

@fjuma fjuma commented Jul 8, 2015

private final String algorithm;
private byte[] hash;
private byte[] seed;
private int sequenceNumber;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these could be final.

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 558 is now running using a merge of a1d3576

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 552 is now running using a merge of a1d3576

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 552 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of a1d3576
Summary: Tests passed: 547, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:20

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 558 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of a1d3576
Summary: Tests passed: 547, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:48

@fjuma
Copy link
Contributor Author

fjuma commented Jul 8, 2015

Made the variables in OneTimePasswordImpl final.

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 560 is now running using a merge of 3debe1f

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 554 is now running using a merge of 3debe1f

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 554 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 3debe1f
Summary: Tests passed: 547, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:21

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 560 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 3debe1f
Summary: Tests passed: 547, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:45

@fjuma
Copy link
Contributor Author

fjuma commented Jul 9, 2015

Updated based on David's comments. Also rebased.

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 571 is now running using a merge of c5d2b9d

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 565 is now running using a merge of c5d2b9d

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 565 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of c5d2b9d
Summary: Tests passed: 547, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:22

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 571 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of c5d2b9d
Summary: Tests passed: 547, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:44

@dmlloyd dmlloyd added the +1 DML label Jul 9, 2015
@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 586 is now running using a merge of c5d2b9d

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 580 is now running using a merge of c5d2b9d

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 580 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of c5d2b9d
Summary: Tests passed: 547, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:23

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 586 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of c5d2b9d
Summary: Tests passed: 547, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:43

@fjuma fjuma removed the rebase this label Jul 14, 2015
@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 586 is now running using a merge of 96099fa

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 592 is now running using a merge of 96099fa

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 586 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 96099fa
Summary: Tests passed: 556, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:43

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 592 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 96099fa
Summary: Tests passed: 556, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:02:10

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 600 is now running using a merge of 96099fa

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 594 is now running using a merge of 96099fa

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 594 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 96099fa
Summary: Tests passed: 556, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:51

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 600 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 96099fa
Summary: Tests passed: 556, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:02:26

darranl added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2015
[ELY-189] OTP SASL client and server implementation and tests
@darranl darranl merged commit 86fe6fb into wildfly-security:master Jul 16, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
4 participants