Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PreProcExampleExtension old format #3830

Closed
wixbot opened this issue Nov 10, 2012 · 6 comments
Closed

PreProcExampleExtension old format #3830

wixbot opened this issue Nov 10, 2012 · 6 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@wixbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@wixbot wixbot commented Nov 10, 2012

The sample preprocessor code (src\ext\PreProcExampleExtension\PreProcExampleExtension) is the old format, it should either be updated or deleted.

Originally opened by nsleigh from http://sourceforge.net/p/wix/bugs/3134/

@wixbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@wixbot wixbot commented Nov 21, 2012

The example uses PreprocessParameter() which I believe is the old method of handling parameters. From the documentation I think this should now be EvaluateFunction().

Loading

@wixbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@wixbot wixbot commented Nov 21, 2012

Old format of what?

Loading

@wixbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@wixbot wixbot commented Oct 22, 2013

Check the chm.

Originally posted by barnson
Area set to extensions

Loading

@wixbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@wixbot wixbot commented Oct 22, 2013

Delete for v3.8.

Originally posted by barnson

Loading

@wixbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@wixbot wixbot commented Oct 24, 2013

Loading

@wixbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@wixbot wixbot commented Oct 26, 2013

Originally changed by barnson
AssignedTo set to bobarnson
Resolution set to fixed
Status changed from Open to Resolved

Loading

@wixbot wixbot added this to the v3.8 milestone Dec 20, 2015
@wixbot wixbot closed this Dec 20, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants