/
19450629_reps_17_183.xml
3260 lines (3260 loc) · 237 KB
/
19450629_reps_17_183.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1945-06-29</date>
<parliament.no>17</parliament.no>
<session.no>3</session.no>
<period.no>1</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">Houseof Representatives. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1945-06-29</day.start>
<para class="block">
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker</inline>(Hon.J. S. Rosevear) took the chair at 10.30 a.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>FLOOD DAMAGE IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA</title>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JVH</name.id>
<electorate>SWAN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MOUNTJOY, Donald</name>
<name role="display">Mr MOUNTJOY</name>
</talker>
<para>-In view of the widespread damage caused by floods in Western Australia, including the washingout of crops, the loss of many lambs, large losses of tomatoes and other vegetables and the evacuation of homes, will the Acting Prime Minister state whether the Government will consider relief measures similar to those being considered in connexion with the flooddamaged areas of New South Wales? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate>MACQUARIE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Treasurer</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member mentioned this matter to me some days ago, and I have also read newspaper accounts of the damage caused by floods in Western Australia, but I have not received any official intimation from the Government of that State, nor has any request been made for relief apart from the representations of the honorable member. During the week, the honorable member for Richmond <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Anthony)</inline> raised the matter of Common wealth relief in necessitous cases in New South Wales. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Baddeley,</inline> the Acting Premier of New South Wales, has sent to me certain proposals which I shall ask Cabinet to consider next Monday. If particulars of damage caused in Western Australia are furnished to me, enabling the circumstances to be surveyed, consideration will be given to the matter. However, as I have already pointed out, local troubles of this kind come within the province of the State governments, and the Commonwealth Government does not usually intervene in other than a great national disaster. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CAPITAL LEVY</title>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4T</name.id>
<electorate>DARLING DOWNS, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FADDEN, Arthur William</name>
<name role="display">Mr FADDEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Acting </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Primp Minister read the statement made by thePostm aster-General <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Cameron)</inline> in the Senate, that the Government may find it necessary to strike a capital levy on fortunes over a certain amount? Will the right honorable gentleman examine this pronouncement in the light of section 51, placitum xxxi. of the Constitution, which gives to the Commonwealth Parliament the power to acquire property " on just terms " ? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not read, but have heard a broadcast announcement of, a statement regarding a capital levy purporting to have been made by the Postmaster-General. Whatever the Postm aster-General may have said on the subject would be merely his personal opinion. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLT, Harold</name>
<name role="display">Mr Holt</name>
</talker>
<para>- He is a Minister of the Crown. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member for Barker <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Archie Cameron),</inline> while a Minister of the Crown, made peculiar statements at times. The Government has not given consideration to any proposal for a capital levy. So far as I am aware - and I am familiar with most of what is in the mind of the Government - it does not propose to do so. Incidentally, the striking of a capital levy does not happen to be a part of the platform of the Australian Labour party. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>AUSTRALIAN ARMY</title>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFW</name.id>
<electorate>WILMOT, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GUY, James Allan</name>
<name role="display">Mr GUY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister repre senting the Minister for the Army investigate allegations that servicemen, some of them B class, after having spent home leave, are being sent out of Tasmania, while A class men who have never been out of Tasmania during the war are allowed to remain? Does the Minister think that is fair treatment of men who have already served in operational areas? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate>CORIO, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister in charge of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is obvious that I cannot give a full explanation unless I know the details. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GUY, James Allan</name>
<name role="display">Mr Guy</name>
</talker>
<para>- All I ask is that the Minister shall investigate the allegations. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3875</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- It may be that men transferred from Tasmania to the mainland are key men needed for responsible positions, and that they have to be transferred notwithstanding that they have given long service overseas, because other men do not possess suitable qualifications. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>If the honorable member will give me the details of .cases which he has in mind I shall have them investigated-. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KRE</name.id>
<electorate>COOK, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SHEEHAN, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Mr SHEEHAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- When making his promised statement to-day in regard to the discharge of service personnel with more than five years' service, will the Acting Prime Minister state what procedure should be adopted by members of the services who desire to obtain their discharge? I have received approximately 30 applications from such men, and consider that I am not the man to whom applications should be made. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr chifley</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have already said that my statement will give particulars of a graduated system under which men will be released, and the general principles that are to be followed. I do not think that I shall be able to state the authority to which applications will have to be made, but I shall make a statement on that point later. i manufacture of cloth. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYV</name.id>
<electorate>HUME, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FULLER, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr FULLER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for Post-war Reconstruction whether it will be possible soon to discontinue the manufacture of single-weft cloth and change over entirely to double-weft in the quantities required to meet home and export requirements. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I appreciate the keen interest taken by the honora'ble member in ensuring the provision of high-quality goods, but I want again to make it clear, as I have done on a hundred occasions, that I have never taken any action, by regulation or otherwise, at any time to prohibit the manufacture of double-weft cloth ; yet the press of this country continues to publish the misleading and false statement that I have. Nor has any other government department taken action to prohibit the manufacture of double-weft cloth. The honorable member asked me whether it would be possible at some future date to discontinue the manufacture of single weft cloth. The Commonwealth Government has no constitutional power to prevent the manufacture of single weft cloth, but State governments have that authority. If it is considered that only double-weft cloth should be manufactured, the necessary representations should be made to the respective State governments. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>AUSTRALIA-UNITED KINGDOM REPRESENTATION</title>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0K</name.id>
<electorate>GRIFFITH, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CONELAN, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr CONELAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- "Will the Acting Prime Minister discuss with the Government of the United Kingdom the advisability of raising the Australian High Commissioner in Great Britain, and the High 'Commissioner for the United Kingdom in Australia, to the status of Minister ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- These matters are constantly under review. When the Deputy Prime Minister <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Forde)</inline> resumes duty, I shall ask him to discuss the subject with the Minister for External. Affairs. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MIGRATION</title>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLT, Harold</name>
<name role="display">Mr HOLT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I understand that cabled press reports have been received stating that the British Government has prepared a White Paper on migration, and that the Commonwealth Government has reached an agreement with Great Britain on the matter of free passages for British ex-servicemen, and assisted passages for civilians who desire to migrate to this country. Has the Acting Prime Minister any knowledge of the issue of that White Paper? If it has been published, will the honorable gentleman make its contents known to honorable members? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3876</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Earlier this week, in reply to a question on migration, I intimated that discussions had taken place between the Governments of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth regarding the migration to Australia of adults and children. On the major points agreement has been reached, and at one period it was understood that the British Government and the Commonwealth Government would simultaneously release statements on the subject. For some reason which I do not recall now, that statement was deferred. I am familiar with the details of the agreement. In my earlier reply, I promised to ask the Minister for the Interior, who is responsible for migration, to prepare a statement on the matter. The usual practice, when agreements are made between two countries, is for the details to be released simultaneously by the two governments, and as soon as possible I shall arrange for the necessary statement to be presented to this Parliament. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>HOUSING</title>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Subdivisionof Large Homes</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>6V4</name.id>
<electorate>MARTIN, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DALY, Fred</name>
<name role="display">Mr DALY</name>
</talker>
<para>- In the metropolitan area of Sydney there are many large homes which the owners are desirous of subdividing, but they are prohibited from doing so by certain municipal council ordinances. Will the Minister for Post-war Reconstruction consider promulgating a national security regulation to give power to councils to suspend such ordinances for the duration of the war, if they consider such action to be desirable, in order that large homes may be subdivided so as to relieve the acute housing shortage ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is a fact that, in the metropolitan areas of Australia, there are numbers of large houses which could be subdivided in order to alleviate the shortage of accommodation. At this time, when there is such a critical shortage of homes, large houses should be subdivided- </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KZR</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WHITE, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Mr White</name>
</talker>
<para>- Why not let the people build houses? That is the way out. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Commonwealth Government has already taken action in this matter by providing finance to enable owners to subdivide such houses if they volunteer to do so, and by giving permits almost automatically to anybody who applies for a permit for that purpose. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQK</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCDONALD, Allan</name>
<name role="display">Mr McDonald</name>
</talker>
<para>- That is not correct. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- That is correct. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLT, Harold</name>
<name role="display">Mr Holt</name>
</talker>
<para>- It has not been our experience. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- If the honorable member will produce one example of the refusal of a permit to subdivide a large house, I shall deal with the matter immediately. I challenge him to produce a single case. It is easy for him to make generalizations, but when he is challenged to produce specific cases he is unable to do so. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLT, Harold</name>
<name role="display">Mr Holt</name>
</talker>
<para>- Applications have been before the Minister's department for months, but have not been dealt with. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Municipal regulations probably prevent the subdivision of large houses in some cases, and, if so, it appears to me that the State governments, from which these municipalities derive their powers, are the proper authorities to alter the regulations. I am tired of having every problem thrown onto the shoulders of the Commonwealth Government. The State governments are close to this problem. They know how many large houses there are in their capital cities, and it is their responsibility to take action in the matter. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>LOCAL GOVERNMENT BODIES</title>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Man-power, Machinery and Materials. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6Q</name.id>
<electorate>WIDE BAY, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CORSER, Bernard</name>
<name role="display">Mr BERNARD CORSER</name>
</talker>
<para>- Owing to the difficulties of local governing authorities arising from the continued shortage of man-power, materials, and machinery, will the Acting Prime Minister consider their desire to be treated as essential services so that they may receive priority in connexion with the release from the services of man-power, materials and machinery? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- As a member of a shire council, I know something of the difficulties of local governing bodies as the result of shortages of man-power and machinery. It has not been possible to provide them with road-making machinery owing to the requirements of the defence services, and some time must elapse before their needs can be satisfied. I know that roads have deteriorated because of the inability of local governing bodies to obtain machinery. Probably that disability will exist longer than the disability caused by man-power shortages, but, in most cases, the two problems are linked. I shall have the matter examined, with particular attention to the shortage of machinery, to see whether it is possible to release from stocks already held by the Allied Works Council sufficient machinery to meet the needs of local governing authorities until such time as new machinery comes onto the market. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE</title>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Ministerial Inquiries</title>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3877</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWT</name.id>
<electorate>MORETON, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRANCIS, Josiah</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRANCIS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the attention of the Minister for Air been drawn to a routine order reported to have been issued in Brisbane by Wing Commander L. J. K. Holton, on the 12th June, in the following terms: - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>Notwithstanding previous instructions, frequent ministerial inquiries are being received at Air Force Head-quarters as the result of private communications between members and their parliamentary representatives with the object of securing favorable consideration of applications or alleged grievances. Air Board views this conduct very seriously, since it is a direct contravention of Air Force Order 12/A/21. </para>
</quote>
<para>Is it to be understood from the inclusion in that order of the words " frequent ministerial inquiries " that responsible Ministers are using their Cabinet rank in an endeavour to institute a system of political preference in the Royal Australian Air Force? Will the Minister cause inquiries to be made into the reason for the issue of the order? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCM</name.id>
<electorate>MARIBYRNONG, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Air</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DRAKEFORD, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr DRAKEFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>- Ministerial inquiries are frequently made, but, so far as I know, only by myself. They are made often at the request of honorable members, including, on occasions, the honorable member for Moreton. I am not responsible for reports that appear in the press. Many newspapers are expert in misrepresentation, a procedure which they use to full capacity. The inquiries which I make from time to time are fully justified. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWT</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRANCIS, Josiah</name>
<name role="display">Mr Francis</name>
</talker>
<para>- Was that routine order issued ? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCM</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DRAKEFORD, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr DRAKEFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not consider that I need to make any explanation on this matter other than that inquiries which I make are frequently rendered necessary by the requests of honorable members of both sides of the House. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TIMBER INDUSTRY</title>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Man-power for Saw-mills. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JS9</name.id>
<electorate>CALARE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BREEN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr BREEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for Labour and National Service to direct the officers of his department who recommend releases from the Army for employment in saw-mills to ensure that a proper proportion of the releases is directed to employment in country sawmills. I make this request because it has long been recognized that a timber combine exists in Australia. The Timber Advisory Panel, which makes recommendations in relation to man-power, is well aware of the position. I am afraid that independent country saw-mills get short shrift from the timber combine. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KHL</name.id>
<electorate>MELBOURNE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>FLP; ALP from 1936</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLLOWAY, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr HOLLOWAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Probably next week, an aggregate quota of men willbe allocated to timber -getting purposes. I shall ask the Timber Advisory Panel, as well as the Director-General of Man Power, to ensure that country sawmills shall share equitably in the allocation. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BRITISH MOTOR VEHICLES</title>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KIX</name.id>
<electorate>DEAKIN, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HUTCHINSON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr HUTCHINSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Minister representing the Minister for Supply and Shipping read in yesterday's Melbourne <inline font-style="italic">Herald</inline> the report that it is not possible to release to the public many small British motor vehicles, because no government department can advise the owners of what the landed cost or the sale price will be? Will the Minister look into the matter, and make an early decision? Will he also make a statement in regard to the immediate future of the Australian motor trade, setting out the number of motor cars that will be allowed to be imported, the exchange that will be available, and whether or not price control will continue to operate ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JOM</name.id>
<electorate>WEST SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Vice-President of the Executive Council</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BEASLEY, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr BEASLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member raised this matter on the motion for the adjournment of the House about a fortnight ago, and the honorable member for Barker <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Archie Cameron)</inline> also complained that the Prices Commission had failed to fix a price for a number of these vehicles which already are in Australia. According to my recollection, an answer was given to the honorable member for Barker. It was not conclusive, I agree, because some particulars in relation to costs overseas had not been furnished to the Australian authorities. I realize the need for an early decision, and shall ask the Department of Trade and Customs to take the matter up again immediately; also, to inquire into the second part of the honorable member's question. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CIVIL AVIATION</title>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Government Ownership of Interstate Air Lines</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3878</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KZR</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WHITE, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Mr WHITE</name>
</talker>
<para>- According to the press, the Acting Prime Minister said last night that notice would be given next week of the bill for the nationalization of interstate air lines. Will the right honorable gentleman state whether or not that is correct? If it is, will he. see that the report of the inter-departmental committee on civil aviation in Australia, which has been held by the Government for more than a year, will be tabled for the information of honorable members before the bill is brought down? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- In response to an inquiry as to when the bill was to be brought down, I said that I understood that the Minister for Civil Aviation would be in a position to give notice of its introduction during the coming week. The report referred to by the honorable gentleman was a report of departmental officers that was made for the information of the Government, and was not intended to be tabled in the Parliament. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWT</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRANCIS, Josiah</name>
<name role="display">Mr Francis</name>
</talker>
<para>- The House should have the fullest information on the subject. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I should not mind the House having information that was correct. A lot of incorrect information has been supplied from different sources. I shall discuss with the Minister for Civil Aviation the tabling of the report. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>RE-ESTABLISHMENT AND EMPLOYMENT BILL 1945</title>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Meeting in Sydney Town Hall. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFX</name.id>
<electorate>LILLEY, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HADLEY, James</name>
<name role="display">Mr HADLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Acting Prime Minister seen the list of speakers at a non-political meeting in the Sydney Town Hall last Wednesday night, held for the purpose of protesting against the Re-establishment and Employment Bill? Is he aware that it included MajorGeneral Maguire, a disgruntled contestant for leadership of the executive of the Liberal party ; Captain Stewart, a defeated Democratic candidate for Bondi; and Lord Mayor Neville Harding, a member of the Liberal party executive, who once said that Australia would be better off under the Japanese? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member for New England <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Abbott)</inline> drew my attention to the fact that this meeting had been held, and I answered certain questions thathe asked in connexion with it. I have since read references to a statement by a <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Maguire</inline> - who, I suspect, had political aspirations. I confess that what he had done or said did not seem to me a matter of great moment. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE AT CROWN CRYSTAL GLASS WORKS</title>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0K</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CONELAN, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr CONELAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister for Labour and National Service state what steps have been taken to settle the industrial dispute at the Crown Crystal glass works, the subject of which, I understand, has been before the Women's Employment Board since May, 1943? Is it true that ampoules - glass containers for penicillin and serums that are urgently needed for the fighting services - cannot be made because of the existence of this dispute? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KHL</name.id>
<electorate>MELBOURNE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Labour and National Service</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLLOWAY, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr HOLLOWAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Unfortunately, it is true that that dispute has been going on since May, 1943. It has been going through the process of legal argument ever since. It has now become very serious. Although only sixteen or seventeen women workers are involved, they were making urgently needed containers. This establishment is the only one in Australia which can make them. That makes it serious. A conference will be held in Sydney this afternoon in the hope that we shall be able to find some means to end the dispute quickly. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MANUFACTURE OF PAINT</title>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3879</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JLZ</name.id>
<electorate>RICHMOND, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ANTHONY, Hubert</name>
<name role="display">Mr ANTHONY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Mosthouses in country districts of New South Wales are wooden. For the last five years they have not been painted. Storekeepers in various towns tell me that it is practically impossible to get sufficient quantities of paint. I have received a letter from one retailer in which he states - </para>