From 120367a5ab68bd8d444467872d9e1aa4808f7353 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marco Felsch Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:47:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] clk: imx: pll14xx: align pdiv with reference manual commit 37cfd5e457cbdcd030f378127ff2d62776f641e7 upstream. The PLL14xx hardware can be found on i.MX8M{M,N,P} SoCs and always come with a 6-bit pre-divider. Neither the reference manuals nor the datasheets of these SoCs do mention any restrictions. Furthermore the current code doesn't respect the restrictions from the comment too. Therefore drop the restriction and align the max pre-divider (pdiv) value to 63 to get more accurate frequencies. Fixes: b09c68dc57c9 ("clk: imx: pll14xx: Support dynamic rates") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa Reviewed-by: Adam Ford Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel Acked-by: Sascha Hauer Tested-by: Ahmad Fatoum Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807084744.1184791-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c index cee18abf59a1f..0d58d85c375e9 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c @@ -137,11 +137,10 @@ static void imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(struct clk_pll14xx *pll, unsigned long rat /* * Fractional PLL constrains: * - * a) 6MHz <= prate <= 25MHz - * b) 1 <= p <= 63 (1 <= p <= 4 prate = 24MHz) - * c) 64 <= m <= 1023 - * d) 0 <= s <= 6 - * e) -32768 <= k <= 32767 + * a) 1 <= p <= 63 + * b) 64 <= m <= 1023 + * c) 0 <= s <= 6 + * d) -32768 <= k <= 32767 * * fvco = (m * 65536 + k) * prate / (p * 65536) */ @@ -184,7 +183,7 @@ static void imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(struct clk_pll14xx *pll, unsigned long rat } /* Finally calculate best values */ - for (pdiv = 1; pdiv <= 7; pdiv++) { + for (pdiv = 1; pdiv <= 63; pdiv++) { for (sdiv = 0; sdiv <= 6; sdiv++) { /* calc mdiv = round(rate * pdiv * 2^sdiv) / prate) */ mdiv = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * (pdiv << sdiv), prate);