From 885c0cc2acfe2c52253b80c92b53f63cbcbdcf31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 19:48:41 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] NFSv4/pnfs: Fix layoutget behaviour after invalidation [ Upstream commit 0b77f97a7e42adc72bd566ff8cb733ea426f74f6 ] If the layout gets invalidated, we should wait for any outstanding layoutget requests for that layout to complete, and we should resend them only after re-establishing the layout stateid. Fixes: d29b468da4f9 ("pNFS/NFSv4: Improve rejection of out-of-order layouts") Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c index c0c2612f14af4..371665e0c154c 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c @@ -2015,7 +2015,7 @@ pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino, * If the layout segment list is empty, but there are outstanding * layoutget calls, then they might be subject to a layoutrecall. */ - if (list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) && + if ((list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) || !pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo)) && atomic_read(&lo->plh_outstanding) != 0) { spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock); lseg = ERR_PTR(wait_var_event_killable(&lo->plh_outstanding, @@ -2391,11 +2391,13 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp) goto out_forget; } + if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo) && !pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo)) + goto out_forget; + if (nfs4_stateid_match_other(&lo->plh_stateid, &res->stateid)) { /* existing state ID, make sure the sequence number matches. */ if (pnfs_layout_stateid_blocked(lo, &res->stateid)) { - if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo) && - pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo)) + if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo)) lo->plh_barrier = 0; dprintk("%s forget reply due to sequence\n", __func__); goto out_forget; @@ -2416,8 +2418,6 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp) goto out_forget; } else { /* We have a completely new layout */ - if (!pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo)) - goto out_forget; pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &res->stateid, lgp->cred, true); }