From e706675beeec3b7fd175105a5defc08313989262 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maxime Coquelin Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:45:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] vduse: Use proper spinlock for IRQ injection [ Upstream commit 7ca26efb09a1543fddb29308ea3b63b66cb5d3ee ] The IRQ injection work used spin_lock_irq() to protect the scheduling of the softirq, but spin_lock_bh() should be used. With spin_lock_irq(), we noticed delay of more than 6 seconds between the time a NAPI polling work is scheduled and the time it is executed. Fixes: c8a6153b6c59 ("vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace") Cc: xieyongji@bytedance.com Suggested-by: Jason Wang Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin Message-Id: <20230705114505.63274-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Acked-by: Jason Wang Reviewed-by: Xie Yongji Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c index 72f924ec4658d..edcd74cc4c0f7 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c @@ -899,10 +899,10 @@ static void vduse_dev_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work) { struct vduse_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct vduse_dev, inject); - spin_lock_irq(&dev->irq_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&dev->irq_lock); if (dev->config_cb.callback) dev->config_cb.callback(dev->config_cb.private); - spin_unlock_irq(&dev->irq_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&dev->irq_lock); } static void vduse_vq_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work) @@ -910,10 +910,10 @@ static void vduse_vq_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work) struct vduse_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vduse_virtqueue, inject); - spin_lock_irq(&vq->irq_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&vq->irq_lock); if (vq->ready && vq->cb.callback) vq->cb.callback(vq->cb.private); - spin_unlock_irq(&vq->irq_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&vq->irq_lock); } static int vduse_dev_queue_irq_work(struct vduse_dev *dev,