From ff557bf971ad6ab34817a82209c0396b8820c9fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:05:51 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] pNFS/NFSv4: Improve rejection of out-of-order layouts [ Upstream commit d29b468da4f940bd2bff2628ba8d2d652671d244 ] If a layoutget ends up being reordered w.r.t. a layoutreturn, e.g. due to a layoutget-on-open not knowing a priori which file to lock, then we must assume the layout is no longer being considered valid state by the server. Incrementally improve our ability to reject such states by using the cached old stateid in conjunction with the plh_barrier to try to identify them. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c index 2b98286376d40..b8712b835b105 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ pnfs_layout_stateid_blocked(const struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, { u32 seqid = be32_to_cpu(stateid->seqid); - return !pnfs_seqid_is_newer(seqid, lo->plh_barrier); + return !pnfs_seqid_is_newer(seqid, lo->plh_barrier) && lo->plh_barrier; } /* lget is set to 1 if called from inside send_layoutget call chain */ @@ -1913,6 +1913,11 @@ static void nfs_layoutget_end(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo) wake_up_var(&lo->plh_outstanding); } +static bool pnfs_is_first_layoutget(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo) +{ + return test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_FIRST_LAYOUTGET, &lo->plh_flags); +} + static void pnfs_clear_first_layoutget(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo) { unsigned long *bitlock = &lo->plh_flags; @@ -2387,17 +2392,17 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp) goto out_forget; } - if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo)) { - /* We have a completely new layout */ - pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &res->stateid, lgp->cred, true); - } else if (nfs4_stateid_match_other(&lo->plh_stateid, &res->stateid)) { + if (nfs4_stateid_match_other(&lo->plh_stateid, &res->stateid)) { /* existing state ID, make sure the sequence number matches. */ if (pnfs_layout_stateid_blocked(lo, &res->stateid)) { + if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo) && + pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo)) + lo->plh_barrier = 0; dprintk("%s forget reply due to sequence\n", __func__); goto out_forget; } pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &res->stateid, lgp->cred, false); - } else { + } else if (pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo)) { /* * We got an entirely new state ID. Mark all segments for the * inode invalid, and retry the layoutget @@ -2410,6 +2415,11 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp) pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return(lo, &lo->plh_return_segs, &range, 0); goto out_forget; + } else { + /* We have a completely new layout */ + if (!pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo)) + goto out_forget; + pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &res->stateid, lgp->cred, true); } pnfs_get_lseg(lseg);