[python] extended xbmcvfs with stat #1537

merged 1 commit into from Oct 6, 2012


None yet

3 participants

tamland commented Oct 4, 2012

Probably not the prettiest api but this seems to be what you can currently do with the code generation.

Replaces #1062


Do you prefer to use a tuple like you did in your previous implementation? That should be easy (I would just need to extend the Tuple<> type parameters length).

tamland commented Oct 4, 2012

No I only made the previous one a tuple because it was the easiest then. Now, as long as the tuples are unnamed, I would say an object is better because that unpacking line will be pretty long and easy to mess up.

amet commented Oct 4, 2012

looks ok to me, cant comment on the code generator details, thats @jimfcarroll

@jimfcarroll jimfcarroll was assigned Oct 6, 2012
@jimfcarroll jimfcarroll merged commit a4acb0c into xbmc:master Oct 6, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment