[python] extended xbmcvfs with stat #1537

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 6, 2012

Projects

None yet

3 participants

@tamland
Member
tamland commented Oct 4, 2012

Probably not the prettiest api but this seems to be what you can currently do with the code generation.

Replaces #1062

@jimfcarroll
Member

Do you prefer to use a tuple like you did in your previous implementation? That should be easy (I would just need to extend the Tuple<> type parameters length).

@tamland
Member
tamland commented Oct 4, 2012

No I only made the previous one a tuple because it was the easiest then. Now, as long as the tuples are unnamed, I would say an object is better because that unpacking line will be pretty long and easy to mess up.

@amet
Contributor
amet commented Oct 4, 2012

looks ok to me, cant comment on the code generator details, thats @jimfcarroll

@jimfcarroll jimfcarroll was assigned Oct 6, 2012
@jimfcarroll jimfcarroll merged commit a4acb0c into xbmc:master Oct 6, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment