Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AppStream Button #24

Closed
aleixpol opened this issue Feb 8, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

AppStream Button #24

aleixpol opened this issue Feb 8, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@aleixpol
Copy link
Collaborator

aleixpol commented Feb 8, 2016

Some time ago we started discussing about the appstream://id scheme.

Then I discussed with our Visual Design Group that it might be interesting to have a button that we can use to indicate that a button leads to an AppStream URI (from a website, although it might make sense on applications as well).

Here's what @Ken-Vermette came up with, and I think it's an interesting approach:
https://share.kde.org/index.php/s/MPpOOEl7JpGAWzu/download

Do you think it would make sense?

@ximion
Copy link
Owner

ximion commented Feb 8, 2016

Mandating or recommending it in the spec IMHO doesn't make sense, as things like that don't belong there.
However, we do have a quickstart guide in there and some other documentation. Adding something like that to these pages makes a lot of sense, since it will make this feature known to app developers and also give them a way to immediately add it to their websites with a fancy button.
So, +1 from me on that. I also like the button design - should the button text be something like "Install app in software center", to make it obvious to people what it does?
The term "AppStream" is probably only known to a few people.

@aleixpol
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aleixpol commented Feb 8, 2016

Mandating or recommending it in the spec IMHO doesn't make sense, as things like that don't belong there.

Why not? I mean, it's not about mandating, because it's not about enforcing but facilitating. If it's not easy, it won't be used at all. A good way to facilitate is by having the Appstream project actively suggest it.

@ximion
Copy link
Owner

ximion commented Feb 8, 2016

It's not really in-scope as part of the specification of AppStream metadata - but as said, making the project suggest it would make a lot of sense.

@ximion
Copy link
Owner

ximion commented Feb 24, 2016

When you have a final design, let me know, so I can include it in the docs!

@ximion
Copy link
Owner

ximion commented Aug 29, 2016

Ping on this one - do we have something ready to ship?

@Ken-Vermette
Copy link
Contributor

Final design attached;

appstream.zip

@ximion
Copy link
Owner

ximion commented Sep 3, 2016

Added as 0aa623a - thank you :-)

@ximion ximion closed this as completed Sep 3, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants