New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AppStream collection YAML #253
Comments
|
Even if the tooling functions Flathub is not interested in using YAML for it. Surely you realize a PR just blindly changing file formats with the comment "No tests have been done." is just... rude? Its a waste of everybodies time for useless churn. (Ironically; Sorry for being off-topic here.) |
|
@jakobjakobson13 |
Sorry, back in that pull request I had the impression that it was surprising that the yaml file did not work.
I get your point and I won't do it again. I just wanted to be cautious and emphasize that even the build process worked, I did not check the functionality of package on my pc. Soryy. |
Yes, thanks. |
It was surprising YAML was a supported format at all I think. Anyway I didn't mean to come off too upset. |
Dear developers,
in a recent pull request the build of a flatpak image failed because the AppStream collection was saved as a
yamlfile and not as ajsonfile.Was this a bug in the configuration of their build workers or is AppStream just not able to handle AppStream collections in yaml formats even though the documentation says otherwise?
Regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: