The current definition of <project_group> sounds somewhat similar to what in GNOME is called "Core apps" or "official GNOME software."
<project_group>
A quick check of Flathub gave me the following usage stats for <project_group>
GNOME: 167 KDE: 144 Pop!_OS: 1 Qt: 7 Solarus: 1 XFCE: 2
At the same time, there currently exist only 29 Core apps in GNOME and only 20 are on Flathub for technical reasons.
I don't think it's realistic to roll back time with the use of this tag. I would suggest one of the following
But those are just some quick ideas
/cc @bertob
Is there someone from KDE we can ping?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current definition of
<project_group>sounds somewhat similar to what in GNOME is called "Core apps" or "official GNOME software."A quick check of Flathub gave me the following usage stats for
<project_group>At the same time, there currently exist only 29 Core apps in GNOME and only 20 are on Flathub for technical reasons.
I don't think it's realistic to roll back time with the use of this tag. I would suggest one of the following
But those are just some quick ideas
/cc @bertob
Is there someone from KDE we can ping?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: