Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

spec: Mention the already-supported scale attribute of <icon/> #353

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 9, 2021

Conversation

pwithnall
Copy link
Contributor

As I understand it, these changes just document the existing semantics
and don’t change anything.

Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall pwithnall@endlessos.org

@ximion
Copy link
Owner

ximion commented Sep 8, 2021

Wow, looks like this was indeed forgotten from the spec! The rule is that the spec change is committed first, and the implementation follows that, apparently on the scale property, that process either didn't exist yet or was ignored.
Thanks for noticing and creating the PR!

docs/xml/collection-xmldata.xml Show resolved Hide resolved
As I understand it, these changes just document the existing semantics
and don’t change anything.

Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
@ximion
Copy link
Owner

ximion commented Sep 9, 2021

Looks good, thank you!

I do notice though that the icons are still explained for "collection metadata", while nowadays we should describe stuff for metainfo files first and only have the collection document describe differences (so this is currently backwards). That's an artifact from when the metainfo spec didn't exist, as collection data was first, and should probably be changed.
But that's out of scope for this PR :-)

@ximion ximion merged commit ea17e1a into ximion:master Sep 9, 2021
11 checks passed
@pwithnall pwithnall deleted the icon-scale branch September 20, 2021 17:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants