New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Legacy from 1.0: 3.10.6 Additional steps and enhancements: file system steps  #49

Open
xml-project opened this Issue Dec 31, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@xml-project
Contributor

xml-project commented Dec 31, 2016

3.10.6 Additional steps and enhancements: file system steps 

This is an aggregation of the discussion on "3.10.6 Additional steps and enhancements: file system steps" (Issue 59 of the xproc/1.0-specification)

Opened by: ndw on 2014-08-22, 18:44h

ndw said on 2014-08-22, 18:44h:

The vocabulary of steps available in XProc is extensible. Users and implementors have developed additional steps. For example, to support pipelines that produce EPUB documents or manipulate files on disk. It is worth considering which, if any, new steps should be elevated to the XProc namespace. The candidates include, but are not limited to: 

File system steps (p:mkdir, p:copy, ...)? 

On 2014-08-22, 18:44h: ndw added requirement should labels.

On 2014-08-25, 22:28h: ndw added this to the XProc 2.0 LC milestone.

On 2015-06-11, 13:03h: xquery added the steps label.
@ndw

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ndw

ndw Sep 6, 2018

Contributor

General agreement, adopt the os steps into a separate, optional spec.

Contributor

ndw commented Sep 6, 2018

General agreement, adopt the os steps into a separate, optional spec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment