New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion on pr #547 is not reflected in the specs #564

Closed
xml-project opened this Issue Oct 17, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@xml-project
Contributor

xml-project commented Oct 17, 2018

In comments to pr #547 we agreed on @ndw 's proposal:

  1. If you have a value template or p:with-option or p:variable expression that doesn't refer to the context item (1+2, $foo, etc.) then it doesn't matter what the context is. You'll never have a problem.
  2. If you refer to the context item then you will get an error if the provided context does not consist of exactly one item. It's a quality of implementation issue to make that message meaningful.

I can't find this new approach in the current specs. What did I miss?

@ndw

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

ndw commented Oct 17, 2018

I think it's an oversight.

@xml-project

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

xml-project commented Oct 17, 2018

Yeah. I just wanted to mark this, so we do not forget.

@eriksiegel

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

eriksiegel commented Oct 17, 2018

Its just not written down yet (since it was recently decided)

@ndw ndw self-assigned this Oct 17, 2018

@ndw

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

ndw commented Oct 17, 2018

Working on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment