New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XS0092 and XS0099: What is the difference #614

Closed
xml-project opened this Issue Nov 1, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@xml-project
Contributor

xml-project commented Nov 1, 2018

Sorry, I am confused with XS0099 introduced yesterdays, saying:

It is a static error to use an option name in p:with-option if the step type being invoked declares that the option is static.

How does this differ from XS0092?

It is a static error if a p:with-option refers to an option that is declared static.

@ndw

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

ndw commented Nov 1, 2018

Uhm...lemme get back to you on that :-)

Maybe it's only needed in p:variable and not in p:with-option. That's most likely.

@ndw

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

ndw commented Nov 2, 2018

Nope. Just an oversight on my part.

@ndw ndw self-assigned this Nov 2, 2018

@ndw ndw closed this in #620 Nov 2, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment