Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Attempt to fix 197 #198
Attempt to fix #197
As far as I can see, data-type on xsl:sort is only for legacy reason, so if you opt to remove
No objections on implementability. I would have expressed a marginal preference for
One proposal: if we're going to keep
which seems better than forcing the
This is also consistent with what XSLT 3.0 did with
So we need to spell out ourselves the behaviour we prefer. I am not sure, it is worth it. Any suggestions?
Since I do not know, how to go on, let's do a little survey:
(A) Change 'data-type' as in XSLT 3.0 and spell out, which behaviour is expected.
(B) Leave 'data-type' as it is in the PR.
(c) Remove 'data-type' completely.
Please take a short moment and give me a letter.