Issue #21746:conditional implementation of gapless numbering #127

merged 1 commit into from Feb 26, 2014

3 participants


No description provided.

@gpazo gpazo merged commit b28cc67 into xtuple:master Feb 26, 2014

How does this deal concurrent requests for the same sequence ? I couldn't see any locking to avoid multiple people getting the same number ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment