-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments. #34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8540cd8
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 13f9fff
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 e6bb7e2
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 e21ed10
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 03a4071
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 298538c
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 6763393
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 315bed4
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 f459b68
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 1bc977d
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 4daeebc
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 abe9f86
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 bedaa64
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 3c248c9
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 a69dfbc
XWIKI-7540: Merge Annotations with Comments.
Enygma2002 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This needs to be commented, is a hack from the annotations pov, since it gets objects directly and uses annotation id as an object number, which is not necessarrily a hard requirement. Other storage can use the ann id differently.
Maybe we could put a test for the annotation class around it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. Will wrap it with a check to see if the current annotationClass in the configuration object is "XWiki.XWikiComments". Thanks.