Node-red

[davidebene]

Hi. Has anyone tested the use of the module within node-red?
I declared globally the module within the settings.js of node-red, and I put the following sample code in a function node:

var TelegramBot = context.global.telegram;
var token = 'my-bot-token';
var bot = new TelegramBot(token, {polling: true});
bot.on('message', function (msg) {
var chatId = msg.chat.id;
var testMsg = "test message";
bot.sendMessage(chatId, testMsg, {caption: "I'm a bot!"});
});

But the debugger gives me the following error:

Unhandled rejection Error: 409 {"ok":false,"error_code":409,"description":"Error: Conflict: terminated by other long poll or webhook"}
at /usr/local/lib/node_modules/node-red/node_modules/node-telegram-bot-api/src/telegram.js:131:15
at tryCatcher (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/node-red/node_modules/node-telegram-bot-api/node_modules/bluebird/js/main/util.js:24:31)
at Promise._settlePromiseFromHandler (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/node-red/node_modules/node-telegram-bot-api/node_modules/bluebird/js/main/promise.js:489:31)
at Promise._settlePromiseAt (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/node-red/node_modules/node-telegram-bot-api/node_modules/bluebird/js/main/promise.js:565:18)
at Promise._settlePromises (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/node-red/node_modules/node-telegram-bot-api/node_modules/bluebird/js/main/promise.js:681:14)
at Async._drainQueue (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/node-red/node_modules/node-telegram-bot-api/node_modules/bluebird/js/main/async.js:123:16)
at Async._drainQueues (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/node-red/node_modules/node-telegram-bot-api/node_modules/bluebird/js/main/async.js:133:10)
at Async.drainQueues (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/node-red/node_modules/node-telegram-bot-api/node_modules/bluebird/js/main/async.js:15:14)
at process._tickCallback (node.js:442:13)

Thanks!

[mahrens917]

I am using a Python API to telegram and occasionally receive the same error, 409.

[Waterloo]

This happens when to program with same token polls the telegram bots api. you can run only one bot with same token at the same time.

[litinskii]

@davidebene This was done by this merge #117