fix: address prototype pollution issue #108
@po6ix @joaogmauricio I appreciate the vulnerability report, I believe this addresses the problem (_let me know if you can confirm). Also let me know if you can think of any additional regression tests.
@JamieSlome, @alromh87, I like the idea of huntr, I'd rather have a company submit a patch than simply notify me of a CVE. #107 was just not inline with how I've been addressing this issue elsewhere in the yargs codebase.
@bcoe will this be backported in the older major version ?
Bumps [y18n](https://github.com/yargs/y18n) from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/yargs/y18n/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/yargs/y18n/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/yargs/y18n/commits) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <email@example.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> There's no changelog entry for this version, but based on the publish date of `4.0.1`, I think the release addresses this issue: yargs/y18n#108