Skip to content
No description, website, or topics provided.
Jupyter Notebook
Branch: master
Clone or download

Latest commit

Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.


Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.



All of the results of the ipython notebook are based on this branch, please clone it and type sudo make in the root directory to build scikit-learn.


In the ipython notebook, I use modified ElasticNet to fit both np.float64 and np.float32 data.

  • np.float64 data

    CD algorithm will converge at iter: 2, and note that dual_norm_XtA: 0.00402187116681.

  • np.float32 data

    CD algorithm will not converge until it meets its max_iter constraint, note that at iter: 2, dual_norm_XtA: 0.00414848327637.

In linear_model/cd_fast.pyx, we use if gap < tol to see whether CD algorithms has converged. However, value of gap depends on const. (See here)

And since const = alpha / dual_norm_XtA, the difference of dual_norm_XtA between np.float32 and np.float64 data determines whether the algorithm is going to converge or not.

And the reason why there's a difference of dual_norm_XtA between two data types is here, which seems like a precision issues.

Fitted Model difference

  • np.float64 data
coef:  [ -2.42662584e-03  -3.23405311e-04  -2.26606091e-03  -4.09731711e-05
   2.36815579e-04  -2.35184599e-03  -1.97140276e-03   2.65987106e-03
  -2.05523620e-04   2.88947000e-03  -8.23956996e-04   1.03828381e-04
   2.16878424e-03   2.52007819e-04   1.82614790e-03  -1.02433215e-05
  -1.02040495e-03   3.78821835e-04  -7.05928649e-04   1.93929478e-03
  -7.95339808e-04   9.60219426e-05  -2.87422712e-03   3.48095138e-03
  -1.07043123e-03   2.42939601e-03   2.65698850e-03   2.30838855e-03
   1.72572969e-03   7.57900144e-04  -2.70316734e-04   9.47966394e-05
  -2.88102505e-03  -1.05059763e-03  -2.82111843e-04  -8.93081088e-05
  -1.34651727e-03  -2.10912355e-03  -5.36561619e-04  -1.78705391e-03]
dual_gap_:  0.493813246525
eps_:  3.34005184625
n_iter:  3
  • np.float32 data (After max_iter=1000)
coef:  [ -2.42662686e-03  -3.23392800e-04  -2.26604822e-03  -4.09707827e-05
   2.36821521e-04  -2.35185120e-03  -1.97140570e-03   2.65986728e-03
  -2.05539080e-04   2.88946461e-03  -8.23946088e-04   1.03828628e-04
   2.16877926e-03   2.52002385e-04   1.82614138e-03  -1.02523700e-05
  -1.02041254e-03   3.78820696e-04  -7.05922081e-04   1.93929370e-03
  -7.95341504e-04   9.60322286e-05  -2.87423586e-03   3.48094734e-03
  -1.07042806e-03   2.42940127e-03   2.65700766e-03   2.30839103e-03
   1.72573759e-03   7.57896807e-04  -2.70330143e-04   9.47993176e-05
  -2.88102520e-03  -1.05059391e-03  -2.82124878e-04  -8.93148390e-05
  -1.34651491e-03  -2.10913876e-03  -5.36567240e-04  -1.78705074e-03]
dual_gap_:  33.1898269653
eps_:  3.34005188942
n_iter:  1000

We can see that the dual_gap_ of ElasticNet when fitting np.float32 data is much larger than eps_, which makes it can't meet the convergence condition if gap < tol.

Note: dual_gap_ = gap, eps_ = tol.

You can’t perform that action at this time.