Upgrade pre-commit requirements ✨

[yezz123]

Upgrade pre-commit requirements to let the code more beautiful

[pull-request-quantifier-deprecated]

This PR has 166 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

---

Quantification details

Label      : Medium
Size       : +119 -47
Percentile : 53.2%

Total files changed: 19

Change summary by file extension:
.yaml : +4 -4
.py : +115 -43

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

• Fast and predictable releases to production:
  • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
    iterations.
  • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
• Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
  • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
  • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detetcted.
• Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
  • Small portions can be assimilated better.
• Better engineering practices are exercised:
  • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
  • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

• Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
  • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
  • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
• Change your engineering behaviors
  • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
    • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
    • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

• One line was added: +1 -0
• One line was deleted: +0 -1
• One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
  interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
• Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
  of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

---

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #154 (c910700) into main (e6f55d6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #154   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.44%   71.44%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        1145     1145           
  Branches       82       82           
=======================================
  Hits          818      818           
  Misses        298      298           
  Partials       29       29           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
authx/api/users.py	59.71% <ø> (ø)
authx/core/jwt.py	96.61% <ø> (ø)
authx/core/logger.py	94.11% <ø> (ø)
authx/database/mongodb.py	33.33% <ø> (ø)
authx/models/user.py	73.03% <ø> (ø)
authx/routers/admin.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
authx/routers/auth.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
authx/services/admin.py	36.73% <ø> (ø)
authx/services/search.py	55.00% <ø> (ø)
authx/resources/error_messages.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e6f55d6...c910700. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

Merging this PR leaves code quality unchanged.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	1.20 ⭐	1.20 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	36.77 ⭐	36.77 ⭐	0.00
Working memory	6.86 🙂	6.86 🙂	0.00
Quality	81.01% ⭐	81.01% ⭐	0.00%

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	2757	2837	80

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
authx/main.py	77.88% ⭐	77.88% ⭐	0.00%
authx/api/users.py	85.79% ⭐	85.79% ⭐	0.00%
authx/core/jwt.py	82.03% ⭐	82.03% ⭐	0.00%
authx/core/logger.py	82.98% ⭐	82.98% ⭐	0.00%
authx/database/mongodb.py	90.52% ⭐	90.52% ⭐	0.00%
authx/models/user.py	76.39% ⭐	76.39% ⭐	0.00%
authx/resources/error_messages.py	89.13% ⭐	89.13% ⭐	0.00%
authx/routers/admin.py	80.86% ⭐	80.86% ⭐	0.00%
authx/routers/auth.py	61.93% 🙂	61.93% 🙂	0.00%
authx/services/admin.py	86.30% ⭐	86.30% ⭐	0.00%
authx/services/search.py	86.98% ⭐	86.98% ⭐	0.00%
tests/routers/test_routers_admin.py	90.03% ⭐	90.03% ⭐	0.00%
tests/routers/test_routers_auth.py	86.87% ⭐	86.87% ⭐	0.00%
tests/routers/test_routers_password.py	84.86% ⭐	84.86% ⭐	0.00%
tests/routers/test_routers_search.py	89.64% ⭐	89.64% ⭐	0.00%
tests/routers/test_routers_social.py	71.78% 🙂	71.78% 🙂	0.00%
tests/services/test_services_auth.py	78.66% ⭐	78.66% ⭐	0.00%
tests/services/test_services_password.py	87.59% ⭐	87.59% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
authx/routers/auth.py	get_router	6 ⭐	383 ⛔	16 ⛔	36.36% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
authx/main.py	Authentication.__init__	0 ⭐	129 😞	21 ⛔	52.43% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/services/test_services_auth.py	test_register	2 ⭐	139 😞	13 😞	56.92% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
authx/api/users.py	UsersProtectionMixin.is_bruteforce	5 ⭐	96 🙂	10 😞	64.59% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
tests/routers/test_routers_social.py	test_callback	0 ⭐	121 😞	10 😞	66.26% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!