Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upGitHub is where the world builds software
Millions of developers and companies build, ship, and maintain their software on GitHub — the largest and most advanced development platform in the world.
Please re-consider again adding support for gloria.tv #10885
Comments
81.6% of search results on Google are removed. [1] That's not "some". Individual legal videos does not sound persuasive.
Redistributing full radio and TV streams definitely violates copyrights, at least in my country (Taiwan). If gloria.tv has bought legal permissions from radio and TV stream creators, that's OK. In this case you need to provide some materials, like news about agreements between gloria.tv and other companies. A previous example is QQ music (#5249), who has bought redistribution permissions from Warner, Sony and more music producing companies. [1] https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/searchdata/domains/?id=gloria.tv |
Before submitting an issue make sure you have:
What is the purpose of your issue?
The issue itself:
I know that in #9553 you decided that the hosted material is copyrighted. I have a counter-example: a public sermon done by a priest Olszewski https://gloria.tv/video/NsFxeem1KCgT1isvRm4V6k3vF, which is incidentally also available on already present extractor for youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH7uPs7RSZc .
Generally, the gloria.tv is full of recorded radio and tv streams. Maybe some of them are copyrighted, but most are of political/religious nature with the implicit intent to be as broadly distributed as possible.
Is my arguing compelling enough to re-open the case for support of gloria.tv, or should I contact the site for written permission?