Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Encrypted sig 87 broken again #1200

Closed
vanilla38 opened this issue Aug 6, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Encrypted sig 87 broken again #1200

vanilla38 opened this issue Aug 6, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@vanilla38
Copy link

@vanilla38 vanilla38 commented Aug 6, 2013

All in title encrypted sig 87 are broken again.
Thanks.

@patrickslin
Copy link
Contributor

@patrickslin patrickslin commented Aug 7, 2013

new sig len 87 algo:

E911918ECB1C18AED66D42DD2B9D0FB1AEF8999E812.FE13EF2964BE256F8C6E3F6103F1DBE70C1FB5A8A66
8A5BF1C07EBD1F3016F3E6C8F652EB1692FE31EF.216E9998FEA1BF0D9B2DD24D66DEA81CEBCE8194

31B01B49DE02A8A630941CDA800A5CD632716018B13.FDDD384821F35B09D76C69E0F7492D1276B1808B8EE
B8081B6721D2947F0E96C67D90B53F028483DDDF.31E810617236DC5A008ADC149036A8A23ED94B11

python:
s[83:53:-1] + s[3] + s[52:40:-1] + s[86] + s[39:10:-1] + s[0] + s[9:3:-1] + s[53]

javascript:
s.slice(54, 84).reverse().join('') + s[3] + s.slice(41, 53).reverse().join('') + s[86] + s.slice(11, 40).reverse().join('') + s[0] +s.slice(4, 10).reverse().join('') + s[53]

@phihag phihag closed this in 36cb11f Aug 7, 2013
@keybounce keybounce mentioned this issue Feb 4, 2018
0 of 4 tasks complete
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.