Updated to version 9999.99.99

[gear4s]

? wtf version

[shaggytwodope]

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:21:58AM -0800, Aaron wrote:

? wtf version

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

what version you attempt to upgrade from? running it gives me

Updating to latest version...
youtube-dl is up-to-date (2012.12.11)

[gear4s]

Whchever one is default in Ubuntu 11.10 (I think 2011.02.* or something). I
just downloaded normally, and it works.

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:39 PM, shaggytwodope notifications@github.comwrote:

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:21:58AM -0800, Aaron wrote:

? wtf version

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

what version you attempt to upgrade from? running it gives me

Updating to latest version...
youtube-dl is up-to-date (2012.12.11)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/606#issuecomment-11730217.

[shaggytwodope]

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 08:51:29AM -0800, Aaron wrote:

Whchever one is default in Ubuntu 11.10 (I think 2011.02.* or something). I
just downloaded normally, and it works.

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:39 PM, shaggytwodope notifications@github.comwrote:

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:21:58AM -0800, Aaron wrote:

? wtf version

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

what version you attempt to upgrade from? running it gives me

Updating to latest version...
youtube-dl is up-to-date (2012.12.11)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/rg3/
youtube-dl/issues/606#issuecomment-11730217>.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

I'm not at all sure about ubuntu, but you update with the sudo youtube-dl -U right?

[phihag]

We have changed our updating mechanism, 9999.99.99 indicates a placeholder version used in the transition to the new updating system.

[shaggytwodope]

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 09:11:41AM -0800, Philipp Hagemeister wrote:

We have changed our updating mechanism, 9999.99.99 indicates a
placeholder version used in the transition to the new updating system.

—
Reply to this email directly or [1]view it on GitHub.
[Jshd8sI44GVrKZBvymxqKIYkpomBBBjtD4kv0su3zjcIxWXM8O8Ip0Cd0IO8JHI9.gif]

References

1. #606 (comment)
   There you go making total sense lol, kudos mate.

[FiloSottile]

Umh, but it was not supposed to be visible... Where have you seen it?