Feature/wallet orchard UA RPCs - #5300
Conversation
9b3843f to
b3c7a41
Compare
|
Force-pushed to clean up |
b3c7a41 to
294472d
Compare
daira
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good so far, some minor comments.
daira
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
utACK 44b0dc7e13e9741aca4033ac2e6b1c82e667ac06 with some more non-blocking suggestions.
|
Blocking: Please rebase this PR to remove commit de1d41b, which should not be in the git history (it is the commit that was pushed directly to #5419, that I subsequently removed because it referred to a non-existent commit). This will also enable the most recent fixup commit (44b0dc7e13e9741aca4033ac2e6b1c82e667ac06) to be removed. |
Also, temporarily don't allow -orchardwallet if running mainnet.
44b0dc7 to
f21c0a4
Compare
Done, just force-pushed (to f21c0a49551a0abccd2efbe37f690e0d902c300f). I'd like to do one more quick force-push for @daira's comments, they shouldn't take long. |
f21c0a4 to
296b743
Compare
|
Force-push (to 296b743cd6d397fc15ec3ce483d128806eeadcaa) to address Daira's review comments. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does this need to be unifiedaddress (i.e. specifically indicating it is a Unified Address), or could it just be address (leaving the address kind defined by the string encoding)? If the latter, then we could instead make this defaultaddress to convey the documented semantics.
The new RPCs aren't functional, only have argument parsing and sample outputs, guarded by experimental -orchardwallet flag. These changes used the tickets linked from zcash#5056 as a guide.
296b743 to
f139cdc
Compare
LarryRuane
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Force-pushed to address review comments
Changes to wallet RPC code for orchard / NU5.
Part of #5177.
Part of #5178.
Part of #5180.
Part of #5181.
Part of #5182.
Part of #5183.
Part of #5191.