Use more inclusive verbiage

[i-am-tom]

This is made in reference to point 1 of the code manifesto, really, and updates documentation accordingly.

This might sound like nitpicking, but I think we'd probably be better off avoiding these references to mental health; thoughts?

[grizzm0]

The context is not regarding a person. In this case sane would mean something more like reasonable/sensible and has nothing to do with mental health.

[i-am-tom]

I totally understand what the word means in this context, and my point is just that there are better ways of phrasing it that don't have any potential to be exclusionary :) This same reasoning is why we avoid words like "retarded" and "dumb" - the context might not have anything to do with humans, but they're needless slurs, and there are plenty of other ways to say the same thing.

[weierophinney]

The wording we use is verbatim from the code manifesto; if you have suggestions on wording, please make them against its own repository, and we will pull them in if merged.

[akrabat]

This PR is against our text not the text of the code manifesto.

…

On 3 May 2016, at 00:17, weierophinney ***@***.***> wrote: The wording we use is verbatim from the code manifesto; if you have suggestions on wording, please make them against its own repository, and we will pull them in if merged.

[weierophinney]

This is what comes of me reading PRs on my phone... Re-opening, and will re-evaluate. Thanks for the PR, @i-am-tom !

[weierophinney]

I back-ported the changes to the documentation source files, which are under the doc/book/ tree of the master and develop branches, and written in markdown. Documentation rebuilds after pushes to master, so you'll see your change show up shortly.

Thanks for the patch, @i-am-tom !