Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

net: ipv6: Zephyr replies to a packet with site-local multicast destination address #10960

Closed
rmstoi opened this issue Oct 31, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

net: ipv6: Zephyr replies to a packet with site-local multicast destination address #10960

rmstoi opened this issue Oct 31, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@jukkar
Labels
area: Conformance Conformance tests area: Networking bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug

Comments

@rmstoi
Copy link
Collaborator

rmstoi commented Oct 31, 2018

Packets should be dropped if site group ID does not match one of the sites administratively assigned to that interface.

dst-site-local-multicast-icmp.pcap.gz
dst-site-local-multicast-tcp.pcap.gz
dst-site-local-multicast-udp.pcap.gz
@laperie laperie added area: Conformance Conformance tests and removed area: Conformance Conformance tests labels Oct 31, 2018
jukkar added a commit to jukkar/zephyr that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2018
@jukkar
net: ipv6: Drop site scope multicast dst address pkt
fc33a0f 
If we receive an IPv6 packet with site scope multicast
address FF05:: then we must drop it as those addresses are
reserved for site network traffic only.

Fixes zephyrproject-rtos#10960

Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com>
@nashif nashif added the bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug label Nov 2, 2018
@jukkar jukkar closed this as completed in 84e85db Nov 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jukkar jukkar

Labels
area: Conformance Conformance tests area: Networking bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@nashif @jukkar @laperie @rmstoi