Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bluetooth: Mesh: Account for ASZMIC in encrypt #29739

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 3, 2020

Conversation

trond-snekvik
Copy link
Contributor

@trond-snekvik trond-snekvik commented Nov 3, 2020

The decision to set aszmic = 1 in the net_tx structure was made after
the variable was passed to the crypto context, creating a discrepancy
between the two when aszmic is 1.

Extracts transport encryption to a separate function.

Signed-off-by: Trond Einar Snekvik Trond.Einar.Snekvik@nordicsemi.no

The decision to set aszmic = 1 in the net_tx structure was made after
the variable was passed to the crypto context, creating a discrepancy
between the two when aszmic is 1.

Extracts transport encryption to a separate function.

Signed-off-by: Trond Einar Snekvik <Trond.Einar.Snekvik@nordicsemi.no>
@trond-snekvik trond-snekvik added bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug area: Bluetooth area: Bluetooth Mesh labels Nov 3, 2020
@trond-snekvik trond-snekvik requested a review from LingaoM Nov 3, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jhedberg jhedberg left a comment

Do we want to backport this?

@trond-snekvik
Copy link
Contributor Author

trond-snekvik commented Nov 3, 2020

Do we want to backport this?

No need, the bug appeared in #28511, which went in after 2.4

LingaoM
LingaoM approved these changes Nov 3, 2020
@jhedberg jhedberg merged commit 2fb56ba into zephyrproject-rtos:master Nov 3, 2020
1 check passed
@trond-snekvik trond-snekvik deleted the crypto_aszmic branch Jul 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: Bluetooth Mesh area: Bluetooth bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants