New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
differentiating lua-openssl from LuaCrypto #4
Comments
|
I need more time to think about it, please wait.... |
|
Why make a lua-openssl. I need a full openssl binding, after googled openssl binding for lua, My mother tongue is not English, Sorry for dimness explain puzzle you. The target of lua-openssl is below: a. Fully support message digest. (Finished) |
|
I do some study on luaCrypto, and It is a not full function bind, So I write a full bind. |
|
With more clear api, and it's easy to update from luaCrypto |
|
Hi @davidm, |
I've updated http://lua-users.org/wiki/CryptographyStuff to include lua-openssl.
As seen, there are a number of other projects that bind to various parts of OpenSSL:
OpenSSL SSL/TLS sockets: see LuaSec (synchronous) and ratchet (coroutine asynchronous). Both use OpenSSL.
OpenSSL crypto: see LuaCrypto (crypto binding), lua-openssl (without TLS/SSL), lmd5 (small MDx/SHAx digest binding)
Two of these apparently aim to be general purpose crpto (non-TLS/SSL) bindings: LuaCrypto and lua-openssl. As seen in the introduction ( http://luacrypto.luaforge.net/manual.html ), I think LuaCrypto may be less extensive that lua-openssl.
I think it's worth adding in your README that lua-openssl does not do SSL/TLS (I think) and some notes about why it differs from LuaCrypto. Could LuaCrypto and lua-openssl be merged? or are the designs too different?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: