-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 383
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Registry resource conditions #3752
Merged
modmuss50
merged 4 commits into
FabricMC:1.20.6
from
SquidDev:registry-resource-conditions
May 20, 2024
Merged
Registry resource conditions #3752
modmuss50
merged 4 commits into
FabricMC:1.20.6
from
SquidDev:registry-resource-conditions
May 20, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Add matching overloads for all add(...) methods which take a varargs list of ResourceConditions. - Add an additional overload for registering RegistryEntry.References directly. This makes it a little easier to register directly from a RegistryBuilder.
maityyy
reviewed
May 3, 2024
...src/main/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/datagen/v1/provider/FabricDynamicRegistryProvider.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modmuss50
approved these changes
May 13, 2024
...src/main/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/datagen/v1/provider/FabricDynamicRegistryProvider.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Looks good, ill add to last call, 1 or 2 trivial things to be looked at before merging. Thanks :) |
Are there any registries where this might fail? I don't remember if there was one that didn't tolerate additional keys, probably zero but maybe we should check, |
modmuss50
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
* Add resource conditions to dynamic registries * Support conditions in FabricDynamicRegistryProvider - Add matching overloads for all add(...) methods which take a varargs list of ResourceConditions. - Add an additional overload for registering RegistryEntry.References directly. This makes it a little easier to register directly from a RegistryBuilder. * Throw error if we cannot add resource conditions * Rename EntryWithConditions to ConditionalEntry (cherry picked from commit a5d5299)
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
last call
If you care, make yourself heard right away!
merge me please
Pull requests that are ready to merge
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds support for resource conditions within dynamic registries.
The registry-contains condition (and all other conditions) have access to the parent registries but not registries in the current
ServerDynamicRegistryType
. In practice, this means conditions can reference theSTATIC
registries, but not dynamic registries (WORLDGEN
) or loot tables (RELOADABLE
).For datagen, this adds additional overrides to
FabricDynamicRegistryProvider.Entries
to add items with resource conditions. This is a bit of a divergence from the other resource condition generators (which useFabricDataGenHelper.consumeConditions
), but I think this makes more sense here.Closes #3632.