Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2021. It is now read-only.

sostat: group packet loss stats into one section #951

Closed
dougburks opened this issue Jun 25, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

sostat: group packet loss stats into one section #951

dougburks opened this issue Jun 25, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@dougburks
Copy link
Contributor

dougburks commented Jun 25, 2016

NIC
PF_RING
Snort or Suricata
Bro

also include a note that Bro capture_loss may indicate upstream packet loss as well

@weslambert
Copy link
Collaborator

Doug,

Is this intended to just re-arrange the sostat output into a single packet loss section, or to modify/simplify it as well (separating certain parts from the other output)? I'm assuming you would want to make it as simple as possible for the end user to diagnose problems and to troubleshoot.

For example, in regard to:

NIC --> only showing the interface, RX, TX Packets, and dropped packets for an interface
PF_RING --> only showing the application and packet loss for pf_ring (instead of the additional info)
Snort/Suricata --> Dropped packets/percentage
Bro --> capture loss, note

Finally, would netsniff-ng be included in this as well?

Thanks,
Wes

@dougburks
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi Wes,

Replies inline.

Is this intended to just re-arrange the sostat output into a single packet loss section, or to modify/simplify it as well (separating certain parts from the other output)? I'm assuming you would want to make it as simple as possible for the end user to diagnose problems and to troubleshoot.

For example, in regard to:

NIC --> only showing the interface, RX, TX Packets, and dropped packets for an interface
PF_RING --> only showing the application and packet loss for pf_ring (instead of the additional info)
Snort/Suricata --> Dropped packets/percentage
Bro --> capture loss, note

Yes, sounds good.

Finally, would netsniff-ng be included in this as well?

Yes, please.

Thanks!

@weslambert
Copy link
Collaborator

@dougburks
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dougburks
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants