Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC: Pull out status_t to the top level to allow using those enum values from clients. #837

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

igorpeshansky
Copy link

@deanberris PTAL. Would like to gauge if this change is actually a good idea.

Copy link
Member

@deanberris deanberris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @igorpeshansky -- I love this idea. We might even be able to consolidate this with the server-side defined status codes as well. Feedback follows.

namespace http {

/// The set of known status codes for HTTP server responses.
enum status_t {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're doing this, then I suggest dropping the _t suffix, and calling it status_code to be more descriptive.

Also, if we're going to do this as well, we might as well add the following:

  • An "unknown" value to be the default (say, 0).
  • More known status codes, even those that are extensions -- we can probably do those later on, instead of in this PR.

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
#ifndef BOOST_NETWORK_PROTOCOL_HTTP_STATUS_HPP_20180501
#define BOOST_NETWORK_PROTOCOL_HTTP_STATUS_HPP_20180501
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider naming this file status_code.hpp along with the suggested change to the enum name.

@anonimal
Copy link

anonimal commented May 1, 2018

@igorpeshansky can you also PR this to branch 0.13-release?

Base automatically changed from master to main February 10, 2021 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants