Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

5.19.0-35-generic removed genhd.h? #299

Open
kattantak opened this issue Mar 3, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

5.19.0-35-generic removed genhd.h? #299

kattantak opened this issue Mar 3, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@kattantak
Copy link

I just tried to recompile on the newest kernel what I got with ubuntu update

dattobd/src/includes.h:13:10: fatal error: linux/genhd.h: No such file or directory
13 | #include <linux/genhd.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.

It seems for me this header is not exist any more in the newest kernel on ubuntu. Please investigate. Thank you.

@nixomose
Copy link
Contributor

nixomose commented Mar 3, 2023 via email

@Swistusmen
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @kattantak we have added support for kernel 5.19, you can check it out

@kattantak
Copy link
Author

kattantak commented Jun 24, 2023

Hello. Building smoothly on 5.19. Thanks for the update.

@kattantak
Copy link
Author

Unfortunately for some reason it is not able to create snapshots. Do you have any idea why or how I can check what can be the problem? Thanks

[ 2901.005212]
[ 3021.836220] INFO: task dbdctl:18133 blocked for more than 966 seconds.
[ 3021.836248] Tainted: G OE 5.19.0-45-generic #46~22.04.1-Ubuntu
[ 3021.836257] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 3021.836265] task:dbdctl state:D stack: 0 pid:18133 ppid: 18132 flags:0x00004002
[ 3021.836275] Call Trace:
[ 3021.836281]
[ 3021.836289] __schedule+0x257/0x5d0
[ 3021.836304] schedule+0x68/0x110
[ 3021.836310] io_schedule+0x46/0x80
[ 3021.836316] folio_wait_bit_common+0x14c/0x3a0
[ 3021.836327] ? filemap_invalidate_unlock_two+0x50/0x50
[ 3021.836335] ? blkdev_writepages+0x20/0x20
[ 3021.836342] do_read_cache_folio+0x14b/0x200
[ 3021.836349] read_cache_page+0x1a/0xb0
[ 3021.836356] read_part_sector+0x3f/0x190
[ 3021.836364] read_lba+0xfc/0x270
[ 3021.836369] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1a6/0x330
[ 3021.836379] find_valid_gpt.constprop.0+0xd5/0x600
[ 3021.836385] ? post_alloc_hook+0xdf/0x120
[ 3021.836400] ? find_valid_gpt.constprop.0+0x600/0x600
[ 3021.836407] efi_partition+0x80/0x3a0
[ 3021.836413] ? vsnprintf+0x3a8/0x560
[ 3021.836421] ? snprintf+0x49/0x80
[ 3021.836428] ? find_valid_gpt.constprop.0+0x600/0x600
[ 3021.836434] check_partition+0x13a/0x270
[ 3021.836440] bdev_disk_changed.part.0+0xb3/0x230
[ 3021.836448] bdev_disk_changed+0x24/0x40
[ 3021.836453] blkdev_get_whole+0x7f/0xa0
[ 3021.836461] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x13c/0x330
[ 3021.836467] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x5d/0x80
[ 3021.836471] disk_scan_partitions+0x5a/0xa0
[ 3021.836477] device_add_disk+0x3d7/0x3e0
[ 3021.836484] __tracer_setup_snap+0x1fe/0x230 [dattobd]
[ 3021.836501] tracer_setup_active_snap+0xb5/0x130 [dattobd]
[ 3021.836514] __ioctl_setup+0xfe/0x1b0 [dattobd]
[ 3021.836528] ctrl_ioctl+0x27e/0x3e0 [dattobd]
[ 3021.836542] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x9a/0xe0
[ 3021.836550] do_syscall_64+0x59/0x90
[ 3021.836556] ? irqentry_exit+0x43/0x50
[ 3021.836562] ? exc_page_fault+0x92/0x1b0
[ 3021.836568] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[ 3021.836575] RIP: 0033:0x7fc5adb1aaff
[ 3021.836582] RSP: 002b:00007fffed6c3a90 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[ 3021.836589] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fc5adb1aaff
[ 3021.836593] RDX: 00007fffed6c3b30 RSI: 0000000040289101 RDI: 0000000000000003
[ 3021.836596] RBP: 00007fffed6c3b60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 3021.836600] R10: 00007fc5ada11df0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fffed6c3d08
[ 3021.836603] R13: 0000561123b07de9 R14: 0000561123b0ad28 R15: 00007fc5adcab040
[ 3021.836610]

@Swistusmen
Copy link
Collaborator

@kattantak I will look into that, are you able to tell me which commit did you build? Also are you using LVM on your machine?

@kattantak
Copy link
Author

I am using the latest commit as freshly cloning the repo. "git clone https://github.com/datto/dattobd.git"
Not using LVM.


Meanwhile my ubuntu updated to 6.2.0-33-generic and I cannot comply the module again.
make[2]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.2.0-33-generic'
warning: the compiler differs from the one used to build the kernel
The kernel was built by: x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-11 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu122.04) 11.4.0
You are using: gcc-11 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1
22.04) 11.4.0
CC [M] /home/mike/dattobd-git/dattobd/src/bio_helper.o
/home/mike/dattobd-git/dattobd/src/bio_helper.c: In function ‘dattobd_set_bio_ops’:
/home/mike/dattobd-git/dattobd/src/bio_helper.c:184:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bio_set_op_attrs’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
184 | bio_set_op_attrs(bio, op, op_flags);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:260: /home/mike/dattobd-git/dattobd/src/bio_helper.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Makefile:2026: /home/mike/dattobd-git/dattobd/src] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.2.0-33-generic'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:17: default] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/mike/dattobd-git/dattobd/src'
make: *** [Makefile:24: driver] Error 2

I just going to compile from source because ubuntu install not working to me.

sudo apt-key adv --fetch-keys https://cpkg.datto.com/DATTO-PKGS-GPG-KEY
Warning: apt-key is deprecated. Manage keyring files in trusted.gpg.d instead (see apt-key(8)).
Executing: /tmp/apt-key-gpghome.rqx86YbDog/gpg.1.sh --fetch-keys https://cpkg.datto.com/DATTO-PKGS-GPG-KEY
gpg: requesting key from 'https://cpkg.datto.com/DATTO-PKGS-GPG-KEY'
gpg: WARNING: unable to fetch URI https://cpkg.datto.com/DATTO-PKGS-GPG-KEY: No such file or directory

@Swistusmen
Copy link
Collaborator

we're currently focusing mostly on kernel 5.19. Tested building on kernel 6.1. So 6.2 is not covered with tests, but we're going there. If you find any solution/ workaround I encourage you to share it with us either by creating PR or suggesting solutions. Thanks for you input

@kattantak
Copy link
Author

OK. no rush with this. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants