You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the Debian maintainer of qcustomplot approached me about transitioning Polyphone to the new version 2.1 of it.
The patch needed for this is minimal, it basically changes -lqcustomplot to -lQCustomPlot (he verified that it at least built fine with just this change). We probably should support both and have the .pro file check which one to use, but my qmake skills are basically nōnexistent.
However, I need to test this. Where is this actually used in Polyphone and how can I test that nothing breaks?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I’ve now uploaded a hack to Debian to avoid it getting removed. It will now build with v2.1 but not v2.0 of the library, so the patch is not upstreamable as-is but someone who knows qmake can easily produce something suitable.
I’ve also not received any response regarding how to test whether the change will still result in a good application. Someone™ should install polyphone (= 2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-3) from Debian unstable once it’s built and test that.
Hi,
the Debian maintainer of qcustomplot approached me about transitioning Polyphone to the new version 2.1 of it.
The patch needed for this is minimal, it basically changes
-lqcustomplot
to-lQCustomPlot
(he verified that it at least built fine with just this change). We probably should support both and have the.pro
file check which one to use, but my qmake skills are basically nōnexistent.However, I need to test this. Where is this actually used in Polyphone and how can I test that nothing breaks?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: