Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(api): GET /api/users/exists #54875

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ojeytonwilliams
Copy link
Contributor

  • feat(api): GET api/users/exists
  • refactor: DRY out usage of isProfane

Checklist:

Closes #54872

@ojeytonwilliams ojeytonwilliams requested a review from a team as a code owner May 20, 2024 09:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added the platform: api Server application that needs familiarity with Express, Loopback, MongoDB etc. label May 20, 2024
@moT01 moT01 added the status: waiting review To be applied to PR's that are ready for QA, especially when additional review is pending. label May 20, 2024
Comment on lines +606 to +609
if (req.validationError) {
void reply.code(400);
return await reply.send({ exists: true });
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current api:
a) "allows" check by email
b) Returns false if the validation fails

I prefer this PR's approach, but, ideally, would expect some other response for a validation error.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
platform: api Server application that needs familiarity with Express, Loopback, MongoDB etc. status: waiting review To be applied to PR's that are ready for QA, especially when additional review is pending.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GET /api/users/exists?username=...
3 participants