Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(mailhog): use docker network address in containers #54877

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024
Merged

fix(mailhog): use docker network address in containers #54877

merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

ojeytonwilliams
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist:

@github-actions github-actions bot added the platform: api Server application that needs familiarity with Express, Loopback, MongoDB etc. label May 20, 2024
@ojeytonwilliams ojeytonwilliams changed the title fix: use docker network address in containers fix(mailhog): use docker network address in containers May 20, 2024
@ojeytonwilliams ojeytonwilliams marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2024 10:54
@ojeytonwilliams ojeytonwilliams requested a review from a team as a code owner May 20, 2024 10:54
@moT01 moT01 added the status: waiting review To be applied to PR's that are ready for QA, especially when additional review is pending. label May 20, 2024
@Sembauke Sembauke merged commit 6fe2b08 into freeCodeCamp:main May 23, 2024
23 checks passed
@ojeytonwilliams ojeytonwilliams deleted the fix/mailhog-in-containers branch May 23, 2024 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Sembauke Sembauke Sembauke approved these changes

@naomi-lgbt naomi-lgbt naomi-lgbt approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
platform: api Server application that needs familiarity with Express, Loopback, MongoDB etc. status: waiting review To be applied to PR's that are ready for QA, especially when additional review is pending.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@ojeytonwilliams @Sembauke @naomi-lgbt @moT01