Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated Build/Package/Deployment System #369

Closed
rcurtin opened this issue Dec 31, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Automated Build/Package/Deployment System #369

rcurtin opened this issue Dec 31, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@rcurtin
Copy link
Member

rcurtin commented Dec 31, 2014

Reported by speet3 on 4 Aug 2011
The ultimate end goal here is to free the developers from a lengthy and tedious release process. This ticket will be the catch-all ticket for which most build server related setup tickets will block.

@rcurtin
Copy link
Member Author

rcurtin commented Dec 31, 2014

Commented by speet3 on 4 Aug 2011
It appears I do not have the correct permission to modify the description of the ticket, so I'll just add it as a comment for now:
The following requirements are excerpted from ticket #18 for as a reminder of intended result of this ticket:

  • Build each revision of MLPACK shortly after it is checked in
  • Upon encountering a build error that was not present before, alert the developer who checked in the erroneous code with a nastygram
  • Be able to run unit tests on the code
  • Be able to run timing tests on the code (Remove fl-build system (all the build.py files) #19)
  • Be able to get profiling information for the code; CMake can compile MLPACK easily with profiling information (though I've not yet checked the code to make that change in) and then gprof can get results (Minimize preprocessor macro usage #20)
  • Compare timing information and profiling information across revisions of the code
  • Produce working executables for Windows, Linux, and OS X
  • Provide automatically built installation packages

@rcurtin
Copy link
Member Author

rcurtin commented Dec 31, 2014

Commented by rcurtin on 5 Aug 2011
Are you sure you can't modify the description? Authenticated users have TICKET_MODIFY permissions; shouldn't that be adequate?

@rcurtin
Copy link
Member Author

rcurtin commented Dec 31, 2014

Commented by speet3 on 5 Aug 2011
Unfortunately, no. Users require the TICKET_EDIT_DESCRIPTION permission to modify the description itself. I can send you a screenshot of what I see if you like.

@rcurtin
Copy link
Member Author

rcurtin commented Dec 31, 2014

Commented by rcurtin on 5 Aug 2011
Ok, I added both TICKET_EDIT_DESCRIPTION and TICKET_EDIT_CC to the authenticated group, so that should solve that issue. It doesn't address the actual reason the ticket was filed though. :)

@rcurtin
Copy link
Member Author

rcurtin commented Jan 5, 2015

Since Github doesn't have good support for blockers/master tickets, I'll go ahead and close this. The only real thing that needs to be completed still is the Windows executable build process; that needs to be integrated with Jenkins. But there's a ticket open for that already -- #365.

@rcurtin rcurtin closed this as completed Jan 5, 2015
rcurtin added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2015
…errors on

Visual Studio.  Thanks to SinisterMJ for pointing this out.  #369.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant