You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue
Some component diagram layout look really messy. Take the following example.
@startumlleft to right directioncomponentComponent {
portp1portp2portp3portp4portp5portp6
}
() A-->p1
() B-->p2
() C-->p3p4--> () Xp5--> () Yp6--> () Z@enduml
Feature request
I suggest to introduce port placement instructions that allow for explicitly deciding on which side of a component (top, bottom, left, or right) a port is to be placed. Similar to arrow direction instructions like A -u-> B or A-up->B we could introduce port placement instructions like port[t] p1 or port[top] p1 and use directions top (or t), bottom (or b), left (or l), and right (or r), e.g.
Issue
Some component diagram layout look really messy. Take the following example.
Feature request
I suggest to introduce port placement instructions that allow for explicitly deciding on which side of a component (top, bottom, left, or right) a port is to be placed. Similar to arrow direction instructions like
A -u-> B
orA-up->B
we could introduce port placement instructions likeport[t] p1
orport[top] p1
and use directionstop
(ort
),bottom
(orb
),left
(orl
), andright
(orr
), e.g.With these instructions I would expect the diagram to be rendered roughly like the following:
The textual notation above is just one suggestion. There might be better syntax alternatives.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: