Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Have a good time" #16

Open
mgaudet opened this issue Jan 18, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

"Have a good time" #16

mgaudet opened this issue Jan 18, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@mgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

mgaudet commented Jan 18, 2021

While writing up a related specification bug I re-read the Type IV subclassing section multiple times.

As a reader, I find myself the phrase "have a good time" to be vague and non-specific. There's a hand-wave here that would be nice to clarify. When someone isn't 'having a good time', what is the specific bad outcome? Is it that the specification is inconsistent here, and has bugs that need to be worked around (my issue suggests yes!) or is it more that the specification support for subclassing around regexp is incomplete, and requires more work than one would reasonably expect?

Both are true, but I think the verbiage ought to be clarified.

@dead-claudia
Copy link

I think the example needs clarified, because it's unclear what the bad behavior is. The bad outcome implied refers not to the spec, but to the users of a given subclass.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants