You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In general, for TC39 proposals, we only file standards positions if we need especially broad feedback prior to Stage 3. Accepting Stage 3 itself is seen as a positive signal; this was recently expressed by Mozilla.
Yes, behind a flag. I agree this isn't sufficient evidence for a position; instead, I think Stage 3 itself provides that evidence, at least for Mozilla, based on the thread I linked above. Maybe the next steps would be to have this sort of meta-discussion somewhere in public with WebKit to understand their preferences on when standards-position issues are filed? @msaboff?
Sorry for the noise, but I found a WebKit standards positions thread which seems to imply a similar interpretation on Stage 3, that no more filings are needed.
While revisiting https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/#times-and-dates for the possibility of recommending Temporal as the canonical type/format going forward (w3ctag/design-principles#101), we realized that there are no signals (or implementation commitments) from anyone other than Chrome.
Would it be possible for the group to file issues for Webkit and Gecko positions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: