Closed
Description
Specification section
Validation spec:
deprecatedreadOnly/writeOnly
What is unclear?
There are several "MAY" words that don't need to be capitalized as they are neither constrictive nor permissive. This usage is just informing the reader that something could happen in the data that the schema is describing; it's not related to an implementation, tooling, or an application.
Proposal
Fix the casing to lowercase.
Do you think this work might require an [Architectural Decision Record (ADR)]? (significant or noteworthy)
No
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Type
Projects
Status
Done
Milestone
Relationships
Participants
Activity
[-]🧹 Clarification: MAYs in `deprecated` section are linquistic, not requirements[/-][+]🧹 Clarification: MAYs in several sections are linquistic, not requirements[/+]jdesrosiers commentedon Jan 15, 2025
Thanks for looking out for things like this. I think there's quite a few places in the spec where we use these uppercase terms inappropriately.