-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.7k
Should document stability of diagnostics_channel publishers. #58234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
diagnostics_channel
Issues and PRs related to diagnostics channel
good first issue
Issues that are suitable for first-time contributors.
Comments
hey Qard , I would like to take this up |
Are you referring to the built-in channels list at the end? Those are all marked experimental as a whole already. |
Yes, that's what I'm referring to. Those should be marked individually as experimental as with functions so we can begin promoting some of them to stable. |
Thanks for clarifying, that makes sense. |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
diagnostics_channel
Issues and PRs related to diagnostics channel
good first issue
Issues that are suitable for first-time contributors.
There is a growing list of channels listed in the diagnostics_channel documentation, but they lack any indication of their stability level. We should probably mark them all as experimental and then review if any should be promoted to stable. I'm leaving this here as a good-first-issue for someone to do the first step of marking them all as experimental.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: